<script async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-1763189992875486"
crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
CPED
General Information
CPED
is comprised of postsecondary institutions looking to reassess, develop, and
implement changes to their current EdD programs. Member schools created a set
of guiding principles intended to refocus the doctorate in education on
rigorous practitioner preparation (Carnegie Project for the Education
Doctorate, 2015) and to differentiate the EdD from the PhD model. The goals of CPED include:
1.
A new definition of the EdD
2.
A set of guiding principles for program development
3.
A set of design-concepts that serve as program building blocks
CPED
Guiding Principles are Framed around questions of equity, ethics, and social
justice to bring about solutions to complex problems of practice. The new EdD
model prepares leaders who can construct and apply knowledge to make a positive
difference in the lives of individuals, families, organizations, and
communities, allows candidates to develop and demonstrate collaboration and
communication skills to work with diverse communities and build partnerships,
and provides field-based opportunities to analyze programs of practice and use
multiple frames to develop meaningful solutions. The CPED develops a
professional knowledge base that integrates both practical and research
knowledge and includes , that links theory with
and systematic inquiry. The model is intended to emphasize the
generation, transformation, and use of professional knowledge and
practice.(CPED,2020)
CPED
website: http://cpedinitiative.org/
The
CPED Design Concepts are fundamental ideas or elements to be used as building
blocks when designing or reconstructing a program, as opposed to a rigid or
prescriptive model that schools must adhere to, allowing each institution to
apply them in a manner that best aligns with their individual program
goals (Carnegie Project for the
Education Doctorate, 2015).
CPED
Cohort Model
The
CPED cohort model is a closed cohort
model, which means once the program begins, there will be no additional
students added to the cohort. The cohort will progress together through the
doctorate program. This model allows for continuous personal and professional
improvement for students through interaction with peer faculty and colleagues
across a broad network of schools of education. The cohort model encourages
students to collaborate on projects, programs, and practices to make
educational settings better places for students, faculty, and communities. The
CPED cohort allows full-time employed practitioners to participate in an
executive program that is accelerated, problem-oriented, and applied. This also
provides students with access to knowledge and skills from their peers, an
array of skills, and professional networking. The cohort fosters a sense of
community, interpersonal relationships, transformative learning, and encourages
graduation rates. Lastly, the CPED
cohort allows for a unique dissertation, the dissertation in practice that can
be completed individually or collaboratively
(T. BROWNE-FERRIGNO and B. D. MAUGHAN 45, 57) (Carnegie Project for the
Education Doctorate, 2015).
CPED
Cohort Examples
Northern
Kentucky University began their cohort as one for superintendents of schools,
it was the “Superintendents Cohort”. The goal was to create leader scholar
communities, operationalize a competency based curriculum, allow students to
engage in international experiences, implement action research, pursue regional
stewardship in the Kentucky school districts, and provide students the
opportunity to complete the Dissertation in Practice. Outcomes of the Northern
Kentucky University cohort model are job embedded applications with measurable
impact on the learning associates school district (113).
Rutgers
University had previouslyprevious made no conscious effort to differentiate the
EdD and PhD programs. In the fall 2010, they created their first cohort using
the CPED model. There were four different concentrations within the doctorate
that students could elect. The cohort would take eight core classes
together, then take eight required and
core classes within their concentration. So all students took the first eight
classes together and then those that selected the same concentration continued
together for another eight courses. Five students from Rutgers agreed the
cohort model provided a support system, different perspectives, and attributed
to their improved communication skills.
Texas
Tech University was a second wave member of CPED and joined after the member
school had already begun working together. The cohort model chosen at Texas
Tech was to bring together the experiences and expertise of students who work
in multifaceted higher education roles, into a collaborative doctoral learning
environment; all of the cohort members worked in higher education (Aiken &
Gerstl-Pepin, 2013, p. 172). This gave the students a unique perspective in
collaboration and allowed them to discuss issues at other institutions that
they may themselves be experiencing.
Lynn
University students are employed full time and the cohort remains together for
all courses. Their program is a three-year program, meeting once a month. The
cohort learns to connect research with practice, identify critical issues in
their laboratory of practice, and use data driven decision making. Lynn
University also allows students to complete a dissertation in practice. The dissertation in practice (DiP), includes
students collaborating on a common theme, using shared research to design
solutions, incorporating modern technology into their final products. Cohort
members are able to work in teams to identify a common problem of practice and
accept differing roles and responsibilities in researching and creating a final
product (Lynn University, 2015). The goal of Lynn University’s DiP is to
produce useful products and resources for schools. Data also shows greater
accomplishment in the collaborative/technology model, than with the traditional
five-chapter book. (LynnUniversity,2015).
Benefits
of a Cohort Model
Data
shows increased graduation rates among cohort models, this is believed to be
due to the sense of community, moral support, and interpersonal relationships
formed within the cohort. The cohort also provides students with a wide variety
of information, they learn from their peers and gain different perspectives on
educational issues. Cohort members are able to collaborate with each other and
learn from each other’s experiences. The cohort provides a network of like
minded individuals from an array of backgrounds to come together and
troubleshoot important issues in their field.
Comments
Post a Comment